A bitter High Court dispute has broken out involving possible neighbours about the development of the wall in a coastal site in the north Dublin suburb, a case which has captivated national awareness following an Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed loved ones household at Sutton Strand, where allegations of organizing breaches, environmental worries, and extensive-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into the courts. The Irish Occasions write-up about René Collier plus the Irish Periods posting about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as an area disagreement has progressed right into a remarkably publicised authorized fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of building performs at the location on Dublin Street, Sutton, in which Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a company director respectively, seek to build their spouse and children dwelling. The situation is becoming emblematic of wider disputes along Eire’s coastline, the place growth pressures collide with environmental protections as well as the sensitivities of set up people. Based on the Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall becoming constructed by their future neighbours goes over and above the boundaries permitted under scheduling permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, equally people of Dublin Street, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases of their setting up permission by creating a wall outside of the boundaries in their web-site, bringing about an encroachment on a Special Location of Conservation. The SAC designation is central into the dispute, as a result regions are subject to rigorous controls less than European and Irish environmental regulation. Within their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even small encroachments might have Long lasting ecological penalties, notably in the sensitive coastal ecosystem for example Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They are really in breach in their arranging authorization, and say the wall, and that is partially developed, is in the right place. Their lawful workforce has characterised the motion as an try and hold off or frustrate a lawful growth. The few accuse litigants of searching for to halt homebuilding so that you can protect their check out, an allegation which has been repeated in court and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal scheduling disputes, in which sights of The ocean are each hugely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described extraordinary attempts via the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by way of ocean in storm to photograph the internet site, As outlined by sworn proof referenced within the Irish Situations. In one account, Rene Collier waded via midsection-significant h2o through a storm to photograph the site Irish Situations, an image which includes since grow to be emblematic from the depth from the dispute. These steps weren't merely symbolic; they were being intended to Get visual proof from the wall’s position relative to tidal strains and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website from the sea Irish Occasions noted, describing how the two men entered the water in the course of intense weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by way of storm water to photograph the internet site became Probably the most striking descriptions to emerge from court docket reporting. The Irish Instances article about accountant Paul Feely noted that these types of actions were being cited to demonstrate the plaintiffs’ perception the wall extended into a region impacted by tidal motion, strengthening their argument that the SAC was becoming encroached upon.
The events at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were being included in detail by the national push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Situations 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Periods January 27 2026 turned extensively searched phrases as readers sought to be familiar with the track record and implications of the case. On that day, the High Court listened to further more submissions on no matter whether interim orders must be granted to halt development pending a complete hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a vital second from the legal timeline.
For the core in the dispute is usually a disagreement more than boundaries, setting up compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely preserve that the wall, as constructed, goes further than what was authorized and intrudes into shielded land. They argue that this isn't a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by profession, has become referred to as meticulous in his evaluation of preparing documents, maps, and problems attached into the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both stressed that their action is determined by issue for environmental protection and adherence to arranging legislation. They reject promises that the situation is about preserving a private see, insisting in its place that it's about making certain that progress at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological boundaries. In affidavits, they've described their long-standing relationship to the realm as well as their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the other aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a few just endeavoring to build Accountant Paul Feely a family members home in accordance With all the regulation. They deny the wall encroaches on a Particular Area of Conservation and say that every one will work have already been performed according to Specialist information and authorized strategies. Their attorneys have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the spectacular actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, which include coming into The ocean during a storm, usually do not change the underlying information.
The situation has also lifted broader questions about how setting up disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute about design of wall at coastal web page happens to be a shorthand description for just a situation that many observers see as increasingly popular. As sea concentrations rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation between non-public land, community foreshore, and protected habitats is becoming more contentious.
The Irish Situations short article about René Collier observed the businessman had Formerly been associated with neighborhood advocacy on planning and environmental issues, though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Occasions posting about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how persons from really different Qualified backgrounds can find by themselves aligned in this kind of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some studies spell their names, are becoming synonymous Using the Sutton Strand case.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site from your sea Irish Times coverage emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded through waistline-superior water for the duration of a storm to photograph the site Irish Moments and René Collier waded by means of waistline-superior water for the duration of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Occasions are phrases that appeared continuously in protection, reflecting both of those the Actual physical reality in the coastline as well as the symbolic character with the act. For supporters of your plaintiffs, these steps demonstrated commitment; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see as an excessive method.
Since the High Court proceedings keep on, the end result stays uncertain. The court should decide whether the wall as built complies with organizing authorization and no matter whether any encroachment right into a Specific Place of Conservation has transpired. The lawful arguments are complex, involving interpretation of maps, tidal details, and scheduling ailments. Still the human aspect stays central: neighbours who should Stay together with one another lengthy following the authorized expenditures happen to be paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about development performs at the internet site on Dublin Street, Sutton, though the implications of the case extend beyond that deal with. For planners, developers, and people alike, the dispute serves being a reminder of the importance of clarity in setting up permissions and sensitivity in coastal enhancement. In addition it underscores how promptly a local disagreement can escalate when elementary issues including environmental safety and house rights are perceived to get at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand remains a place of all-natural attractiveness and contested boundaries. The wall with the centre on the dispute stands partially constructed, a physical manifestation of unresolved lawful issues. Irrespective of whether it can eventually be altered, removed, or done as planned will depend on the court docket’s results. Until finally then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will probable keep on to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to one of the most closely watched planning disputes in north Dublin lately.